<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Dude, this is gay, you can&#8217;t bite people&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fort90.com/dude-this-is-gay-you-cant-bite-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fort90.com/dude-this-is-gay-you-cant-bite-people/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dude-this-is-gay-you-cant-bite-people</link>
	<description>The homebase of Matthew Hawkins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://fort90.com/dude-this-is-gay-you-cant-bite-people/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fort90.com/journal/?p=118#comment-79</guid>
		<description>And yet here, points are being taken away because of it&#039;s perceived audience.

BTW, I think it&#039;s worth pointing out that Ratchet and Clank 3 in that same issue got a perfect 10. Huh? But that&#039;s a &quot;kiddie&quot; game too. If a magazine is going to pander to an audience, and make themselves fools in the process, they should at least be consistent about it.

The whole purpose of a review is to relay information to those who need it. If the game is good, then it&#039;s the reviewer&#039;s responsibility to let the whole know this... &lt;strong&gt;especially&lt;/strong&gt; to those who might normally shun the game in the first place due to misguided notions. Instead, GI has chosen to help perpetuate stereotypes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet here, points are being taken away because of it&#8217;s perceived audience.</p>
<p>BTW, I think it&#8217;s worth pointing out that Ratchet and Clank 3 in that same issue got a perfect 10. Huh? But that&#8217;s a &#8220;kiddie&#8221; game too. If a magazine is going to pander to an audience, and make themselves fools in the process, they should at least be consistent about it.</p>
<p>The whole purpose of a review is to relay information to those who need it. If the game is good, then it&#8217;s the reviewer&#8217;s responsibility to let the whole know this&#8230; <strong>especially</strong> to those who might normally shun the game in the first place due to misguided notions. Instead, GI has chosen to help perpetuate stereotypes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Goldstein</title>
		<link>https://fort90.com/dude-this-is-gay-you-cant-bite-people/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>David Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fort90.com/journal/?p=118#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Movie reviewers will often give an &quot;offset&quot; for films which would have much greater appeal to target audiences... &quot;Add a star for kids under 12&quot;, for example.

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movie reviewers will often give an &#8220;offset&#8221; for films which would have much greater appeal to target audiences&#8230; &#8220;Add a star for kids under 12&#8243;, for example.</p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
